THE ROLE OF AGENT-RELATIVITY IN RESOLVING ETHICAL TRILEMMAS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DEONTOLOGY AND CONSEQUENTIALISM
Abstract
Abstract
This study examines ethical trilemmas, which arise when an agent faces three conflicting moral duties, of which only two can be fulfilled simultaneously. Traditional ethical theories, such as deontology and consequentialism, provide useful guidance but are limited in resolving these complex moral conflicts. Deontology prioritizes duties and universal rules but often lacks flexibility, while consequentialism emphasizes outcomes but can overlook personal obligations. By introducing agent-relativity, which tailors moral reasons to the agent’s perspective, this study demonstrates a more balanced and practical approach to ethical decision-making. The research evaluates how deontology and consequentialism incorporate agent-relativity and proposes a hybrid framework to guide real-world moral choices.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.