AN EXAMINATION OF PROHIBITED WEAPONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW
Abstract
The conduct of warfare has evolved significantly, with technological advancements introducing increasingly sophisticated weaponry. These developments have necessitated the regulation of both the means and methods of warfare to mitigate unnecessary suffering and protect civilians and civilian objects. While International Humanitarian Law (IHL) establishes principles to govern warfare, it specifically prohibits certain categories of weapons due to their indiscriminate effects or capacity to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering. Prohibited weapons under IHL include chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, as well as cluster munitions and anti-personnel mines. The use of chemical weapons during World War I and the atomic bombings in World War II revealed the catastrophic humanitarian and environmental tolls of certain weapons, prompting international efforts to prevent their recurrence. These weapons have been explicitly banned or heavily restricted through multilateral treaties such as the 1925 Geneva Protocol, the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the Convention on Cluster Munitions.The fundamental aim of these legal frameworks is to balance military necessity with humanity, ensuring that the conduct of hostilities adheres to the principles of proportionality, necessity, and distinction.
However, the evolving nature of warfare has brought these issues to the forefront in contemporary conflicts. For instance, the 2023-2024 escalation in Gaza saw global outrage and widespread allegations against Israel for deploying prohibited weapons, such as white phosphorus, in densely populated areas. Such weapons, though banned under IHL, are reported to have caused severe civilian harm and environmental destruction, sparking debates over accountability and enforcement of international law. Similarly, the ongoing war in Ukraine has raised concerns over the use of cluster munitions and incendiary weapons, further highlighting the urgent need to reinforce compliance with IHL prohibitions.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.