AN APPRAISAL OF FRONTLOADING SYSTEM UNDER THE HIGH COURT CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES IN NIGERIA AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF PLEADED DOCUMENT NOT FRONTLOADED

Student: Shehu Zainab Ahmad
Supervisor: Dr Ahmad Aliyu
HOD: Dr Aliyu Ibrahim
Department of Law
Law
Umaru Musa Yaradua University, Katsina, Katsina State

Abstract

This research aims to provide an appraisal of the frontloading system under the High Court Civil Procedure Rules in Nigeria and examines the legal effect of documents that are not frontloaded. The frontloading system is a new approach to civil litigation in Nigeria, which requires parties to file and exchange all relevant documents they intend to rely upon before the trial begins. The research further examines the implications of non-compliance with the frontloading requirements, the burden of proof on parties, and the admissibility of documents not frontloaded. It argues that failure to frontload documents may result in legal consequences such as the court striking out of the pleadings or evidence or preventing the parties from relying on non-frontloaded documents. The research concludes by emphasizing the importance of parties understanding the frontloading system in civil litigation and complying with the requirements to ensure a fair and just trial.

Full-Text Access Notice

In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication. During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.

Request authorisation from the author