FACTORS AFFECTING MEDICAL STUDENT PREFERENCES FOR DIGITAL OR TRADITIONAL ANATOMY EDUCATION IN KANO STATE

Background to the Study Anatomy education is a critical component of medical training, traditionally taught through cadaveric dissection and hands-on practical sessions. However, advancements in technology have introduced digital tools such as 3D models, virtual dissections, and augmented reality, transforming anatomy education globally. In Kano State, Nigeria, where access to cadaveric resources and digital infrastructure varies, students’ preferences for traditional versus digital anatomy education remain uncertain. This study investigates the factors influencing medical students’ choices between these two approaches, considering accessibility, effectiveness, and resource availability. Research Methodology A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 150 undergraduate medical students from Bayero University Kano (BUK) and Northwest University Kano. Data was collected through an online questionnaire, assessing student demographics, learning preferences, and perceived advantages and challenges of digital and traditional anatomy education. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant factors influencing student preferences. Results and Findings The findings indicate that the majority of students favor a hybrid approach that integrates both traditional and digital methods. Cadaveric dissection remains the preferred traditional method due to its hands-on experience and spatial learning benefits, while digital tools are valued for their accessibility, flexibility, and enhanced visualization. The study also identifies key challenges: limited access to cadavers, ethical concerns, high costs, inadequate digital infrastructure, and lack of familiarity with digital learning tools. Despite these challenges, students recognize the complementary benefits of both approaches, emphasizing the need for an integrated curriculum. Conclusions and Recommendations This study highlights the need for a balanced approach to anatomy education that incorporates both traditional and digital methods. To enhance medical training, institutions should invest in digital infrastructure, improve access to cadaveric resources, and provide training to enhance digital literacy among students and faculty. Additionally, future research should explore the long-term impact of hybrid learning models on knowledge retention and clinical competency. These recommendations aim to modernize anatomy education while ensuring accessibility and effectiveness in resource-limited settings.