AN EVALUATION OF PETER SINGER’S PHILOSOPHY OF GLOBAL JUSTICE
Abstract
The philosophy of global justice has increasingly gained prominence in contemporary ethical debates, particularly through the influential work of philosopher Peter Singer. Singer's utilitarian approach places a strong emphasis on the moral obligations of individuals in affluent societies to alleviate suffering and extreme poverty around the world, irrespective of national boundaries. His view challenges conventional attitudes toward charity and aid by arguing that these are not optional acts of generosity but rather moral duties. The central problem this study seeks to address is the tension between Singer’s persuasive moral imperative and the feasibility of applying such rigorous ethical standards in the real world. The aim is to critically evaluate both the moral force and practical implications of Singer’s theory of global justice. By critically engaging with Singer’s ideas and responses from other thinkers such as Thomas Pogge and Onora O’Neill, the study uses evaluative method to evaluate the coherence, feasibility, and moral urgency of Singer’s vision for global justice.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.