A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN LOCKE’S CONCEPT OF HUMAN NATURE
Abstract
Abstract
This paper explores John Locke's concept of human nature as presented in his foundational
work, "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding" (1690). Locke challenges the prevailing
notion of innate ideas, proposing instead that the human mind at birth is a tabula rasa—a blank
slate. According to Locke, all knowledge and personal characteristics emerge from sensory
experiences and reflections upon those experiences. The investigation covers Locke’s central
arguments, emphasizing his belief in the primacy of sensory input and experience in shaping
human understanding. It examines how this empiricist viewpoint diverges from earlier rationalist
philosophies, particularly those of René Descartes, and assesses the implications of Locke’s
theory for the development of epistemology, psychology, and education.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.