QUALITY EVALUATION OF SMOOTHIE FROM SOURSOP, BANANA, CARROT AND GINGER
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the quality characteristics of smoothies produced from blends of carrot
(Daucus carota), banana (Musa spp.), soursop (Annona muricata), and ginger (Zingiber officinale).
The aim was to develop a nutrient-enriched and microbiologically safe functional beverage using
locally available crops. Five smoothie formulations were prepared with varying proportions of the
ingredients: 100% soursop (control), 90% soursop + 5% banana + 5% ginger, 80% soursop + 10%
banana + 5% ginger + 5% carrot, 70% soursop + 15% banana + 5% ginger + 10% carrot, and 60%
soursop + 20% banana + 5% ginger + 15% carrot. The results showed that ash content ranged from
0.19% to 0.33%, moisture from 88.66% to 90.26%, pH from 3.36 to 3.62, °Brix from 5.45 to 6.15,
and titratable acidity from 0.056% to 0.133%. The microbial load decreased progressively with
increased carrot and banana inclusion, with total viable bacterial count ranging from 1.1 × 10³ to
1.8 × 10³ CFU/mL, total coliform count from 4.1 × 10¹ to 3.4 × 10² CFU/mL, and total fungal count
from 4.1 × 10¹ to 5.3 × 10² CFU/mL. Sensory evaluation revealed that the smoothies were all
acceptable, with appearance scores ranging from 7.60 to 8.07, aroma from 7.67 to 8.00, taste from
7.33 to 8.20, and overall acceptability from 7.53 to 8.20. The control (100% soursop) and sample
B (90% soursop + 5% banana + 5% ginger) received the highest consumer ratings. The study
concluded that the incorporation of carrot and ginger enhanced the nutritional, sensory, and
microbiological quality of soursop-based smoothies. Samples B was found most suitable for large
scale production based on their balanced physicochemical composition, microbial safety, and
sensory appeal. The study recommends further evaluation of storage stability and nutrient retention
to optimize the product for commercial and functional food applications.
Full-Text Access Notice
In accordance with the NERD Policy on promoting peer-reviewed publication, public access to the full text of a project, thesis or dissertation is restricted for three years, allowing the author and supervisors sufficient time to pursue peer-reviewed publication.
During this period, researchers with legitimate academic or research purposes may request authorisation directly from the author to enable NERD to release the indexed full texts of the work using the form below.